The Effect of Guided Inquiry Integrated with the SAMR Model (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) on Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Eva Nurlailiyah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Zulfiani UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v18i2.520

Keywords:

Guided Inquiry, SAMR Model, Learning outcome, Respiratory System, Biology

Abstract

Teacher centered biology learning results in low cognitive learning outcomes for students. Pedagogical innovation that systematically integrates investigative approaches with technology is needed. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with the SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) model on student learning outcomes in biology lessons on the respiratory system. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group was employed, involving 65 Grade XI students from a state senior high school in South Tangerang City, drawn through purposive sampling. The experimental class of 32 students received Guided Inquiry learning integrated with SAMR, while the control class of 33 students received Guided Inquiry without SAMR integration. Data were gathered using pretest and posttest instruments in multiple-choice format, which had been validated and tested for reliability. The analytical procedures encompassed N-Gain calculation, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, Levene's homogeneity test, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Findings indicated that the average posttest score of the experimental class (97.57) exceeded that of the control class (90.36) with a difference of 7.21 points, , with an N-Gain of experimental class 84.10 in the high category. The Mann-Whitney U test yielded an Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000 (< 0.05), confirming a statistically significant effect. The use of Guided Inquiry combined with the SAMR model had a significant impact on student learning outcomes, as it was shown to effectively improve the quality of biology learning.

Author Biography

Zulfiani, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

References

Alfiana, H. (2021). Peningkatan model SAMR serta penerapannya untuk pembelajaran online yang mendalam. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(1), 55–67.

Amijaya, L. S., Ramdani, A., & Merta, I. W. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. J. Pijar MIPA, 13(2), 94–99.

Fitroh, S. F., Mustafida, F., & Ertanti, D. W. (2025). Peran Guru Kelas Sebagai Fasilitator Belajar Aktif di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. JPMI: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(2), 126–134.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2017). A Review of the Literature on the Integration of Technology into the Learning and Teaching of English Language Skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95.

Hajaroh, S., & Raehanah. (2021). Statistik Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Sanabil.

Hake, Richard R. “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66, no. 1 (January 1, 1998): 64–74.

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441.

Kaflori, S. I., & Rafianti, I. (2023). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning dengan Integrasi Teknologi SAMR Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMA Wilangan. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika , 4(3).

Lestari, G. D., Irawati, H., Dahlan Jl Ringroad Selatan, A., Banguntapan, K., & Istimewa, D. (2020). Literature Review: Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Dan Motivasi Siswa Pada Materi Biologi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiri. BIOMA: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(2), 51–59.

Lovisia, E. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar. Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), 2(1).

Nair, R., & Choo Chuan, T. (2021). Integrating Technology that Uses Modified SAMR Model as a Pedagogical Framework in Evaluating Learning Performance of Undergraduates. The Educational Review, USA, 5(2), 373–384.

Putri, R., Ardhiansyah, S. S., Kurnia, H., Sari, M. I., & Putri, M. F. J. L. (2022). Penerapan Deep Learning dalam Pendidikan Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Pamulang, 2, 98.

Rianandari, N., & Heru Purnomo, A. (2023). Penerapan Model Guided Inquiry terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Kelas II Sekolah Dasar. Khazanah Pendidikan, 17(2), 237.

Salsabila, U. H., & Agustian, N. (2021). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Pembelajaran. Islamika : Jurnal Keislaman Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1).

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.

Sukarelawa, M. I., Indratno, T. K., & Ayu, S. M. (2024). N-Gain vs Stacking. Penerbit Suryacahya.

Wahyuni, S., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). Teachers’ Technology Integration Into English Instructions: SAMR Model. Proceedings of ISET , 443, 546–550.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jorpres (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 7(1), 53–59.

Zulfiani, Z., Suwarna, I. P., El Islami, R. A. Z., & Sari, I. J. (2025). Trends in SAMR research in teaching and learning from 2019 to 2024: A systematic review. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 12(4), 99–106.

Downloads

Published

01-07-2026

How to Cite

Eva Nurlailiyah, & Zulfiani. (2026). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Integrated with the SAMR Model (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) on Student Learning Outcomes. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 18(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v18i2.520

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.